Why the marketing funnel doesn't work for architects (and what does)

Why the marketing funnel doesn't work for architects (and what does)

Marketing funnels are one of those ideas that sound completely logical until you try to apply them to an architecture practice. Then things get complicated quickly.

The funnel model assumes people move neatly from awareness to interest to consideration to decision. In a world of impulse purchases and short sales cycles, that's a reasonable approximation. In architecture, where projects take years, clients appoint on trust and long established relationships, and the same practice might be talking to a developer, a local authority and a private client simultaneously, it falls apart.

I've spent over 24 years marketing architecture practices and I want to make the case for a different way of thinking about how you win work.

Why funnels are too simple for architecture

At any given moment, only around 5% of your potential clients are actively looking to appoint an architect. The other 95% are busy with other things according to joint research by the Ehrenberg-Bass Institute and LinkedIn. They might need you in six months or two years. They might be mid project with another practice. They might be waiting for funding, planning approval or a board decision to come through.

If your marketing is designed to push people through a funnel towards a conversion point, you're spending most of your energy on people who aren't ready and can't be made ready by an email campaign or a downloadable guide.

The other problem is the buying group. Projects are rarely commissioned by one person acting alone. There might be a client lead, a board or trustees, a project manager, a funding body, an internal estates team. Each of those people has a different perspective on the appointment and different things they need to feel confident about. A funnel built around one decision maker misses most of the picture.

What positioning research shows

Marketing strategist April Dunford makes a point that resonates strongly in architecture. Between 40 and 60% of B2B purchase processes end in no decision at all. Not a competitor winning the work. Just nothing happening, because the decision felt too risky, too complex or too much effort.

In architecture this rings very true. Clients default to practices they already know. They appoint firms they've heard good things about from people they trust. They avoid risk because nobody gets blamed for sticking with a known quantity. Your marketing needs to work with this reality rather than pretend it doesn't exist.

What actually works

The practices that win work consistently are not necessarily the ones with the best websites or the most active social media. They're the ones who are visible and trusted with the right people over time, so that when a client does move into that 5% who are ready to act, they're already on the shortlist before the formal process begins.

Consistent LinkedIn presence from the people who lead the practice makes a real difference here. Not corporate broadcasting but personal posts about the work, the thinking, the challenges and the sector issues clients care about. When a developer you've never met sees your perspective on viability and design quality regularly, you're building familiarity and trust without a single sales conversation.

Getting in front of the right people in the right rooms still matters enormously too. Not every event and not every room, but the specific places where your target clients spend time. A well targeted breakfast event or roundtable with 20 of the right people will do more for your pipeline than most digital campaigns.

Content that demonstrates genuine expertise, articles, opinion pieces and case studies that show you understand the problems your clients are dealing with, whether that's planning complexity, sustainability requirements or budget pressure, builds credibility over time. The key is that it helps rather than sells.

Staying visible with people who aren't ready to buy yet

One of the most useful shifts in thinking is to stop treating your marketing as something designed to convert and start treating it as something designed to keep you trusted and memorable.

The client who isn't in market today might be in six months. The developer who appoints someone else this time might come back on the next scheme. The estates director who reads your article on retrofit might be building an internal case for a project that won't go public for another year. Your job is to make sure that when any of those things happen, you're the practice they think of.

That's not a funnel. That's a long game played consistently. And in architecture, it's the game that wins.

If you want to think through how this applies to your practice, book a call. Or listen tothe Built Environment Marketing Show episode on this topic where I discuss the limits of funnel thinking and what works better in professional services with marketing consultant Anna O'Riordan.

See my architecture marketing services

Thanks for reading

If you want to get clear on what's actually working in your marketing and what's just noise, that's exactly what I do. I work with AEC Directors and marketing leads to deliver strategic marketing that helps you compete. Email ayo@abbasmarketing.com

 

More thoughts

Previous
Previous

Social media posting is down 12%. What built environment firms can do next

Next
Next

Why marketing funnels don't work for construction firms (and what to do instead)